Real Estate|Regulation

ERA Sets Tree-Planting Precedent in Comino Development Controversy

ERA Sets Tree-Planting Precedent in Comino Development Controversy

ERA has required the developer to plant 540 indigenous trees to compensate for 54 protected trees removed for a Comino resort project.

EV
Editorial Staff14 August 2026

The Environment and Resources Authority has broken its silence on the public backlash over the uprooting of trees in Comino's nature reserve. In a statement issued today, ERA confirmed it has imposed a tree-planting condition on the developer, Hili Group.

The condition is specific. For every protected tree removed under the development permit, the applicant must plant ten indigenous trees elsewhere on the island. That means 540 new trees for the 54 protected trees that will be felled.

This commitment stems from an ERA condition requiring the applicant to plant 10 trees for each of the 54 protected trees that will be removed under the development permit for Comino.

The development in question includes 44 pools, 16 villas, and a 140-room hotel. Activist group Moviment Graffiti had claimed that 800 trees in total would be uprooted, sparking public outrage.

“The authority that is supposed to protect Malta’s environment just approved the uprooting of 800 trees within Comino’s nature reserve,” the group said. It warned of a “ferocious response” if construction proceeds.

ERA defended its decision by pointing to the Environmental Impact Assessment carried out by the applicant. “These plans are supported by ERA’s scientific expertise as well as the findings of the mandatory EIA,” the Authority stated.

For Malta's business community, the condition carries significance beyond this single project. The 10:1 replacement ratio for protected trees sets a regulatory benchmark that could apply to future developments in ecologically sensitive areas.

Developers now face a clear signal from ERA: environmental conditions are tightening, and the cost of compliance, both financial and reputational, is rising. Any project touching protected habitats should factor in substantial tree-planting obligations from the start.

The public backlash also underscores the reputational risk for operators like Hili Group. Activist groups are mobilising, and social media scrutiny is intense. In a small market, public sentiment can translate into regulatory and commercial pressure quickly.

Whether the 540-tree commitment will satisfy critics remains uncertain. Moviment Graffiti has not backed down. The coming months will test both ERA's enforcement capacity and the developer's ability to deliver on restoration promises.